Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine 2000;17:180-184; doi:10.1136/emj.17.3.180
© 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
J Accid Emerg Med 2000; 17:180-184
© 2000 the Emergency Medicine Journal

Original article

The effect of a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) on diagnostic performance in the accident and emergency department

Gwyn Weatherburn1, Stirling Bryan2, Anne Nicholas3 and Robert Cocks4

1 Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH
2 Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
3 Accident and Emergency Department, Hammersmith Hospital, London
4 A&E Medicine Academic Unit, Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Gwyn Weatherburn (e-mail: gwyneth.weatherburn{at}brunel.ac.uk)

Objective—A study has been conducted to identify the benefits to the accident and emergency (A&E) department of a hospital wide Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS).

Methods—The study was conducted in two parts: firstly while the hospital was using conventional radiographic films, and secondly when the PACS was in operation. For each part of the study, the diagnoses of radiographic images made by A&E clinicians were compared with those made by radiologists. This resulted in the estimation of the incidence of false negative findings by the A&E staff. The management of patients with such findings was studied to identify those for whom a change of treatment was required. Such data for the two periods, when film and when PACS was used, were compared.

Results—It was found that the overall rate of misdiagnoses across all A&E patients who had radiography was low in both periods and there was a significant reduction when PACS was used (1.5% for film and 0.7% for PACS, 95% CI for difference between proportions: -0.014 to -0.0034), but the rate of serious misdiagnoses involving patient recall did not change significantly (95% CI for difference between proportions: -0.0059 to +0.0001).

Conclusions—When PACS was used the diagnostic performance by A&E staff improved by reducing false negative interpretations but the rate of serious misdiagnosis did not change.

Keywords: PACS; misdiagnosis; radiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Benger, J R, Noble, S M, Coast, J, Kendall, J M (2004). The safety and effectiveness of minor injuries telemedicine. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 438-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Benger, J R, Lyburn, I D (2003). What is the effect of reporting all emergency department radiographs?. Emerg. Med. J. 20: 40-43 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shaw, G. (2001). A clinician's guide to digital X-ray systems. JRSM 94: 391-395 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs