© 2001 the Emergency Medicine Journal
Original article
Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?
Accident and Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Goodacre, Research Fellow in Accident and Emergency (steveg{at}doctors.org.uk)
BackgroundStudies from the United States (US) suggest that using a chest pain observation unit (CPOU) saves from $567 to $2030 per case compared with hospital admission. These savings will only be reproduced in the United Kingdom (UK) if the cost of routine hospital admission is similar. This study aimed to review current practice to determine the proportion of patients suitable for CPOU evaluation, the cost per case of routine admission and compare this with control groups in US studies.
Methods300 patients were randomly selected from those admitted with chest pain between January and June 1998. Two independent observers reviewed the case notes to determine who would have been suitable for CPOU management. Resource use of those selected was then determined.
ResultsNotes were retrieved for 285 patients. A total of 106 (37.2%) were suitable for CPOU care. Mean length of stay was 51 hours (median 24). Only two patients were admitted to the coronary care unit. Interventional cardiology was limited to two angiograms, one angioplasty and one bypass graft. Estimated mean cost per patient was £458 ($733) with interventional cardiology included, £356 ($570) without.
ConclusionPotential exists for the introduction of CPOU care to reduce health service costs in the UK. However, the magnitude of cost savings demonstrated in US studies were achieved by comparison to relatively high inpatient costs and should not be extrapolated. Economic evaluation of the CPOU should be repeated in the UK. The inclusion of interventional cardiology costs is an important determinant of cost effectiveness.
Keywords: chest pain; cost analysis; myocardial infarction; hospital admission
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Goodacre, S, Calvert, N
(2003). Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain. Emerg. Med. J.
20: 429-433
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Sinharay, R
(2003). Cost effective strategy to risk stratify acute chest pain cases at a district general hospital. Postgrad. Med. J.
79: 485-485
[Full Text] -
Taylor, C, Forrest-Hay, A, Meek, S
(2002). ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?. Emerg. Med. J.
19: 395-399
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Clancy, M.
(2002). Chest pain units. BMJ
325: 116-117
[Full Text] -
Goodacre, S W, Morris, F M, Campbell, S, Arnold, J, Angelini, K
(2002). A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital. Emerg. Med. J.
19: 117-121
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Dougan, J.P., Mathew, T.P., Riddell, J.W., Spence, M.S., McGlinchey, P.G., Nesbitt, G.S., Smye, M., Menown, I.B.A., Adgey, A.A.J.
(2001). Suspected angina pectoris: a rapid-access chest pain clinic. QJM
94: 679-686
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
