Original article

Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is superior to intranasal midazolam for emergency paediatric procedural sedation

J P Acworth¹, D Purdie², R C Clark¹

¹ Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, Q 4029, Australia
² Epidemiology and Population Health Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Acworth (email clarkr{at}health.qld.gov.au)

Objectives—This study compared intranasal midazolam (INM) with a combination of intravenous ketamine and intravenous midazolam (IVKM) for sedation of children requiring minor procedures in the emergency department.

Method—A single blinded randomised clinical trial was conducted in the emergency department of a major urban paediatric hospital. Subjects requiring sedation for minor procedures were randomised to receive either INM (0.4 mg/kg) or intravenous ketamine (1 mg/kg) plus intravenous midazolam (0.1 mg/kg). Physiological variables and two independent measures of sedation (Sedation Score and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale) were recorded before sedation and at regular intervals during the procedure and recovery period. Times to adequate level of sedation and to discharge were compared.

Results—Fifty three patients were enrolled over a 10 month period. Sedation was sufficient to complete the procedures in all children receiving IVKM and in 24 of the 26 receiving INM. Onset of sedation was an average of 5.3 minutes quicker with IVKM than with INM (95%CI 3.2, 7.4 minutes, p<0.001). Children given INM were discharged an average of 19 minutes earlier than those given IVKM (95%CI 4, 33 minutes, p=0.02). Mean Sedation Scores and Visual Analogue Sedation Scale scores for the 30 minutes after drug administration were significantly better in children given IVKM compared with INM (2.4 and 1.8 versus 3.5 and 3.8, respectively). Both doctors and parents were more satisfied with sedation by intravenous ketamine and midazolam.

Conclusions—Intravenous ketamine plus midazolam used in an appropriate setting by experienced personnel provides an excellent means of achieving sedation suitable for most non-painful minor procedures for children in the emergency department. This combination is superior to INM in terms of speed of onset and consistency of effect. INM delivered via aerosol spray has a more variable effect but may still be adequate for the completion of many of these procedures.

Keywords: intranasal midazolam; intravenous ketamine; sedation; children

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Newton, A, Fitton, L (2008). Intravenous ketamine for adult procedural sedation in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 498-501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hrobjartsson, A, Forfang, E, Haahr, M., Als-Nielsen, B, Brorson, S (2007). Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding. Int J Epidemiol 36: 654-663 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Green, S M, Krauss, B (2004). Ketamine is a safe, effective, and appropriate technique for emergency department paediatric procedural sedation. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 271-272 [Full Text]  
• Howes, M C (2004). Ketamine for paediatric sedation/analgesia in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 275-280 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McGlone, R G, Howes, M C, Joshi, M (2004). The Lancaster experience of 2.0 to 2.5 mg/kg intramuscular ketamine for paediatric sedation: 501 cases and analysis. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 290-295 [Abstract] [Full Text]