Original article

A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 (mild to moderate) ankle sprains

B L Watts¹ and B Armstrong²

¹ Accident and Emergency Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3LY, UK
² Emergency Department, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Watts, Specialist Registrar (Beverley.Watts{at}ukgateway.net)

Objective—To compare functional outcome in patients with acute grade 1 or 2 (mild to moderate) lateral ankle sprains randomised to treatment with or without a double tubigrip bandage (DTG).

Methods—400 patients presenting to the accident and emergency (A&E) departments of a teaching hospital and a district general hospital and diagnosed with grade 1 or 2 lateral ankle sprains were randomised to treatment with or without a DTG bandage. A standardised telephone questionnaire was performed one week after presentation. The main outcome measures were: number of days until walking unaided, number of days off work, whether the injury kept the patient awake at night, whether analgesia was taken.

Results—197 of 400 patients completed follow up. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex and occupation between the treatment groups. There were no significant differences between those who did and those who did not complete follow up. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for number of days until walking unaided (95% CI -0.21 to 0.88 days), number of days off work (95% CI -0.70 to 1.02 days) or whether the injury kept the patient awake at night (95% CI -10 to 17%). There was a significant difference between the groups in the use of analgesia (95% CI 10 to 36%); the difference seemed to be that patients treated with DTG required significantly more analgesia.

Conclusions—Treatment of grade 1 and 2 ankle sprins with DTG does not seem to lead to a shorter time to functional recovery and may increase the requirement for analgesia.

Keywords: ankle sprain; compression bandage; double Tubigrip

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wardrope, J, Barron, D, Draycott, S, Sloan, J (2008). Soft tissue injuries: principles of biomechanics, physiotherapy and imaging. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 158-162 [Full Text]  
• Glasziou, P. (2007). Do all fractures need full immobilisation?. BMJ 335: 612-613 [Full Text]  
• Boyce, S H, Quigley, M A, Campbell, S (2005). Management of ankle sprains: a randomised controlled trial of the treatment of inversion injuries using an elastic support bandage or an Aircast ankle brace. Br. J. Sports. Med. 39: 91-96 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cooke, M W, Lamb, S E, Marsh, J, Dale, J (2003). A survey of current consultant practice of treatment of severe ankle sprains in emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg. Med. J. 20: 505-507 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mason, S, Watts, B (2002). What about patient satisfaction following acute ankle sprains?. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 183-183 [Full Text]  
• Brooks, S C, Watts, B, Armstrong, B (2002). Effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 ankle sprains. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 91-92 [Full Text]  
• Lewis, D, Atkinson, P, Watts, B L, Armstrong, B (2002). Effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 ankle sprains. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 90-91 [Full Text]