Original article

Comparing two different methods of identifying alcohol related problems in the emergency department: a real chance to intervene?

A Hadida¹, N Kapur¹, K Mackway-Jones², E Guthrie¹, F Creed¹

¹ Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
² Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Kapur (mdbpsnk2{at}man.ac.uk)

Objectives—To examine the feasibility of screening for alcohol problems in a representative flow sample of patients attending a busy UK emergency department. To compare two methods of identifying alcohol related problems in the emergency department.

Methods—Brief interview administered by the same interviewer to a representative flow sample of 429 patients attending a single accident and emergency department over a six week period. Measures included a CAGE questionnaire and assessments by the patient and staff as to whether the attendance was alcohol related.

Results—413 patients (96%) were successfully screened. Of these, 115 (28%) patients were considered to have an alcohol related attendance on the basis of the CAGE questionnaire or the staff assessment. Head injuries and psychiatric presentations were particularly likely to be associated with alcohol misuse. Compared with those identified by staff, patients scoring above threshold on the CAGE were more likely to attend during routine working hours and recognise they had an alcohol problem.

Conclusions—Emergency departments may provide an opportunity for the early prevention of alcohol related difficulties. However, patients with alcohol problems who present to the emergency department are not a homogenous group. Different screening methods identify different groups of patients, who in turn may respond to different forms of intervention. Further research examining the efficacy and feasibility of different alcohol treatment approaches is needed to enable us to target specific interventions to those patients who might most benefit.

Keywords: alcohol

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Indig, D, Copeland, J, Conigrave, K M (2009). Comparing methods of detecting alcohol-related emergency department presentations. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 596-600 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nietert, P. J., French, M. T., Kirchner, J. E., Booth, B. M. (2007). Utilization and Cost of Mental Health, Substance Abuse, and Medical Services among At-Risk Drinkers. Med Care Res Rev 64: 431-448 [Abstract]  
• NORDQVIST, C., WILHELM, E., LINDQVIST, K., BENDTSEN, P. (2005). CAN SCREENING AND SIMPLE WRITTEN ADVICE REDUCE EXCESSIVE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AMONG EMERGENCY CARE PATIENTS?. Alcohol Alcohol 40: 401-408 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• OWENS, L., GILMORE, I. T., PIRMOHAMED, M. (2005). HOW DO NHS GENERAL HOSPITALS IN ENGLAND DEAL WITH PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOL-RELATED PROBLEMS? A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY. Alcohol Alcohol 40: 409-412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Malone, D, Friedman, T (2005). Drunken patients in the general hospital: their care and management. Postgrad. Med. J. 81: 161-166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Huntley, J, Blain, C, Touquet, R, Kapur, N, Mackway-Jones, K (2002). Screening for alcohol misuse.. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 185-185 [Full Text]