Review

Emergency medicine terminology in the United Kingdom—time to follow the trend?

C Reid, L Chan

Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Reid, 36 Berkeley Close, Southampton SO15 2TR, UK (fastbleep{at}hotmail.com)

Objective—To determine the frequency of use of the terms "accident and emergency" and "emergency medicine" and their derivatives in original articles in the Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine.

Methods—Hand search of all articles in the Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine from September 1995 to July 2000, categorising the first use of terminology in each original article to describe the specialty, its departments, or their staff into either accident and emergency or emergency medicine groups.

Results—There is a clear trend towards increasing use of the terms emergency medicine, emergency physician and emergency department, with decreasing use of the terms accident and emergency medicine, accident and emergency department and accident and emergency doctor, although the latter group still constitutes the majority.

Conclusion—The use of emergency medicine to describe the specialty in the United Kingdom is increasing, although this may reflect the Journal's growing international standing. This trend should be taken into account in the debate over the specialty's name in this country.

Keywords: terminology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Davis, R. M, Pless, B. (2001). BMJ bans ""accidents"". BMJ 322: 1320-1321 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

It was an accident - is it an Emergency?

Patrick K Plunkett

EMJ Online, 9 Mar 2001 [Full text]

What should be clearcut has somehow been usurped

Daniel Fatovich

EMJ Online, 30 Aug 2001 [Full text]

Re: What should be clearcut has somehow been usurped

C Reid, et al.

EMJ Online, 30 Aug 2001 [Full text]