Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2001;18:95-98; doi:10.1136/emj.18.2.95
© 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2001; 18:95-98
© 2001 the Emergency Medicine Journal

Original article

Carbon monoxide poisoning: correlation of neurological findings between accident and emergency departments and a hyperbaric unit

R Lynch1, G Laden2 and P Grout1

1 Accident and Emergency Department, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK
2 Clinical Hyperbaric Facility, BUPA Hospital, Hull

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Mr Lynch, Specialist Registrar in Accident and Emergency (rlynch{at}tinyworld.co.uk)

Objectives—To investigate and quantify the differences in neurological examination findings in patients acutely poisoned with carbon monoxide, between initial assessment at accident and emergency (A&E) departments and subsequently at a hyperbaric unit.

Methods—Retrospective case note review of all patients referred to the Hull Hyperbaric Unit for treatment of acute carbon monoxide poisoning between August 1998 and August 1999. Patients who were ventilated or less than 16 years old were excluded because of difficulty in assessing their neurological status.

Results—Thirty patients were included for analysis. The mean duration from exposure to assessment in A&E was four hours while patients were reviewed on average three hours later at the hyperbaric unit. Referrals came from 14 different hospitals. A history of loss of consciousness accounted for 70% of referrals. A mean of 3.2 neurological signs per patient was documented in A&E compared with 9.2 at the hyperbaric unit. Seventy nine per cent of abnormal neurological signs were not detected at A&E departments compared with 3% at the hyperbaric unit. The major source of discrepancy was in sharpened Rhomberg's test and heel-toe gait, in 13% of patients examined in A&E departments these signs were recorded as abnormal compared with 90% at the hyperbaric unit.

Conclusion—There is a large discrepancy in neurological findings between assessment in A&E departments and the Hull Hyperbaric Unit. A number of factors may account for this including interobserver variation, patient deterioration during transfer, poor documentation, lack of understanding of the sequelae of carbon monoxide poisoning and inadequate examinations. Further research is required to quantify the impact of the various factors that may contribute to the differences in neurological findings.

Keywords: carbon monoxide poisoning; hyperbaric oxygen; neurological examination


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hopkins, R. O., Woon, F. L. M. (2006). Neuroimaging, cognitive, and neurobehavioral outcomes following carbon monoxide poisoning.. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 5: 141-155 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs