Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2001;18:444-447; doi:10.1136/emj.18.6.444
© 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2001; 18:444-447
© 2001 the Emergency Medicine Journal

Original article

Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in the treatment of threatened miscarriage in the accident and emergency department

L Weinberg

Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Weinberg, 67 Carrine Road, Newbridge, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3XB, UK (weinberg14{at}aol.com)

Background—The UK guidelines for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for rhesus prophylaxis have been revised. Anti-D immunoglobulin is no longer recommended for Rh D negative women after a threatened miscarriage less than 12 weeks gestation. These patients are at risk of rhesus immunisation, and there should be a policy for their treatment in the accident and emergency (A&E) department.

Design—A retrospective study over a 17 month period was conducted looking at women less than 12 weeks gestation who presented to an A&E department with a threatened miscarriage.

Objectives—To determine how many of these patients presented with heavy or repeated bleeding, or abdominal pain, and whether the guidelines for the use of rhesus prophylaxis were followed.

Results—112 women fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Nineteen patients were Rh D negative. Eighty three patients (74.1%) presented with either abdominal pain or heavy or recurrent bleeding. Rhesus status was recorded in the A&E notes in only 15 patients (13.3%). Ninety seven patients (86.6 %) were discharged without rhesus status being checked. Fifteen Rh D negative patients were discharged without being offered anti-D immunoglobulin.

Conclusion—Many women who present to the A&E department with a threatened miscarriage of less than 12 weeks gestation have heavy or recurrent bleeding or associated abdominal pain. These patients have an increased risk of fetomaternal haemorrhage and the consequent development of haemolytic disease of the newborn is possible. It should be mandatory for the A&E department to record rhesus status. In the context of A&E medicine, anti-D immunoglobulin should still be offered to all non-immune Rh D negative women presenting with a threatened miscarriage less than 12 weeks gestation.

Keywords: anti-D immunoglobulin; miscarriage; rhesus prophylaxis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Eager, R, Sutton, J, Spedding, R, Wallis, R (2003). Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in maternal trauma. Emerg. Med. J. 20: 498-498 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in maternal trauma
Robert P Eager, et al.
EMJ Online, 28 May 2002 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs