© 2001 the Emergency Medicine Journal
Original article
Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in the treatment of threatened miscarriage in the accident and emergency department
Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Weinberg, 67 Carrine Road, Newbridge, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3XB, UK (weinberg14{at}aol.com)
BackgroundThe UK guidelines for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for rhesus prophylaxis have been revised. Anti-D immunoglobulin is no longer recommended for Rh D negative women after a threatened miscarriage less than 12 weeks gestation. These patients are at risk of rhesus immunisation, and there should be a policy for their treatment in the accident and emergency (A&E) department.
DesignA retrospective study over a 17 month period was conducted looking at women less than 12 weeks gestation who presented to an A&E department with a threatened miscarriage.
ObjectivesTo determine how many of these patients presented with heavy or repeated bleeding, or abdominal pain, and whether the guidelines for the use of rhesus prophylaxis were followed.
Results112 women fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Nineteen patients were Rh D negative. Eighty three patients (74.1%) presented with either abdominal pain or heavy or recurrent bleeding. Rhesus status was recorded in the A&E notes in only 15 patients (13.3%). Ninety seven patients (86.6 %) were discharged without rhesus status being checked. Fifteen Rh D negative patients were discharged without being offered anti-D immunoglobulin.
ConclusionMany women who present to the A&E department with a threatened miscarriage of less than 12 weeks gestation have heavy or recurrent bleeding or associated abdominal pain. These patients have an increased risk of fetomaternal haemorrhage and the consequent development of haemolytic disease of the newborn is possible. It should be mandatory for the A&E department to record rhesus status. In the context of A&E medicine, anti-D immunoglobulin should still be offered to all non-immune Rh D negative women presenting with a threatened miscarriage less than 12 weeks gestation.
Keywords: anti-D immunoglobulin; miscarriage; rhesus prophylaxis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Eager, R, Sutton, J, Spedding, R, Wallis, R
(2003). Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in maternal trauma. Emerg. Med. J.
20: 498-498
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in maternal trauma
- Robert P Eager, et al.
- EMJ Online, 28 May 2002 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
