Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2002;19:114-116; doi:10.1136/emj.19.2.114
© 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2002; 19:114-116
© 2002 the Emergency Medicine Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Choice of fluid for resuscitation of septic shock

A Sparrow, T Hedderley, S Nadel

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Nadel, Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK;
s.nadel{at}ic.ac.uk

Objectives: To determine current practice in choice of fluid resuscitation in children following publication of a systematic review that demonstrated a higher mortality in patients treated with human albumin solution.

Methods: A descriptive telephone and postal questionnaire survey directed at the on call paediatric registrar, lead clinician for paediatrics and the paediatric pharmacist at each of 33 hospitals within the Greater London area. The study was coordinated by the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit at St Mary's Hospital, London. The questionnaire was designed to assess whether a protocol/guidelines existed for resuscitation fluid in children with septic shock; whether the participants were aware of the systematic review and if so, had it changed clinical practice. The word "protocol" was used in its broadest sense to include guideline and policy.

Results: 11 hospitals had guidelines for fluid resuscitation of septic shock in children. These varied greatly: only three gave clear instructions of which fluid to use and how to use it. Choice of fluid varied widely and there was wide discrepancy between consultant's and registrar's choice of fluid. The systematic review had lead to a change in policy in two thirds of respondents.

Conclusion: It is apparent that few paediatric departments have a written protocol or guidelines for the management of septic shock that is accessible to all those concerned in the acute treatment of seriously ill children. The systematic review into choice of fluid has had an impact on clinical practice with no data regarding whether this is in the patient's best interests.

Keywords: fluid resuscitation; paediatrics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs