Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2002;19:122-125; doi:10.1136/emj.19.2.122
© 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2002; 19:122-125
© 2002 the Emergency Medicine Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Emergency management of chest pain: patient satisfaction with an emergency department based six hour rule out myocardial infarction protocol

C R Richards, K Richell-Herren, K Mackway-Jones

Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor K Mackway-Jones;
kevin.mackway-jones{at}man.ac.uk

Objective: To measure the level of patient satisfaction with an emergency department based chest pain assessment unit.

Design: Structured patient satisfaction surveys.

Setting: Inner city university hospital emergency department

Participants: 383 consecutive patients aged over 25 years with probable cardiac chest pain of less than 12 hours duration at moderate to low risk of acute myocardial infarction.

Intervention: Two structured questionnaires—the first addressing satisfaction with different aspects of the health care process, the second designed to assess global satisfaction outcomes.

Results: 274 patients (74%) fully or partly answered the first questionnaire. There were high levels of satisfaction with all process of care issues (waiting time, information, discussion, explanation, pain management, personal needs, family needs, and discharge preparation). Altogether 258 patients fully or partly answered the second questionnaire. Global satisfaction was high. Subgroup data analysis showed white patients significantly more satisfied than non-white patients (p<0.0001), and over 45s significantly more satisfied than under 45s (p<0.01). A number of issues were raised in the free comment section of the second questionnaire. The lack of a definitive diagnosis at discharge was a recurring theme.

Conclusion: Chest pain assessment units are acceptable from a patient perspective.

Keywords: patient satisfaction; myocardial infarction; protocol


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs