Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2002;19:126-128; doi:10.1136/emj.19.2.126
© 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2002; 19:126-128
© 2002 the Emergency Medicine Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

What's the point of ST elevation?

S D Carley1, R Gamon2, P A Driscoll2, G Brown3 and P Wallman1

1 Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK
2 Hope Hospital, Salford, UK
3 University Hospitals of South Manchester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S D Carley, Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
s.carley{at}btinternet.com

Objective: The magnitude of ST elevation is a key piece of information in the decision to thrombolyse in acute myocardial infarction. The ability of clinicians to reliably identify ST elevation has not been previously assessed. This study sought to determine the variability in assessment of ST elevation in a group of doctors who commonly prescribe thrombolysis.

Methods: The study was conducted in three large teaching hospitals in Manchester, England. A convenience sample of 63 SHOs and SpRs from emergency and general medicine were recruited. Each was shown three sample ECG complexes. They were asked to identify and quantify the degree of ST elevation. They then indicated the points on the ECG from which they measured ST elevation.

Results: ST elevation was not identified in 12% of cases. Doctors used a wide variety of points on the ST segment to assess elevation, this resulted in a wide variation in the observed magnitude of ST elevation.

Conclusion: No guidance exists on where exactly ST elevation should be measured. This study shows a wide variation in practice. Protocol led thrombolysis decision pathways may be compromised by these findings.

Keywords: electrocardiography; ST segment; interobserver variablility; thrombolysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Winter, R, Willenheimer, R (2004). The incremental value of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) as a bedside decision-making tool in the coronary care unit. Eur J Echocardiogr 5: 149-155 [Full Text]  
  • (2002). At what point should ST elevation be measured?. Heart 88: 416-416 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs