Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2002;19:405-407; doi:10.1136/emj.19.5.405
© 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.
Emerg Med J 2002; 19:405-407
© 2002 the Emergency Medicine Journal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A randomised, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) with adhesive strips (Steristrips) for paediatric laceration repair

A Mattick, G Clegg, T Beattie, T Ahmad

The Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr A Mattick, Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 1 Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK;
anthony.mattick{at}virgin.net

Objective: To compare the tissue adhesive 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) with adhesive strips, Steristrips in paediatric laceration repair.

Method: Children with suitable lacerations were randomly allocated for wound closure with either a tissue adhesive or adhesive strips. Thirty children were treated in each group. Linear Visual Analogue Scores were used to judge parents' and nurses' opinions of the application of each treatment. A similar scoring system was used to judge the cosmetic outcome as viewed by parents and a plastic surgeon. Complications and trial failures were noted.

Results: Complete data were available for 44 of the children. Parents viewed the treatments as equally acceptable. In contrast those performing the procedure judged the tissue adhesive more difficult to apply. Scores of cosmetic outcome by both parents and the plastic surgeon showed no significant difference in the treatment method used. There were four children in the tissue adhesive group and one from the adhesive strip group in whom the wounds were unable to be closed.

Conclusion: Both tissue adhesives and adhesive strips are excellent "no needle" alternatives for the closure of suitable paediatric lacerations. This study suggests that the techniques are similar in efficacy, parental acceptability, and cosmetic outcome. The choice as to which is used may come down to economics and operator preference.

Keywords: tissue adhesive; cyanoacrylates; adhesive strips; laceration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rhee, J. S., McMullin, B. T. (2008). Outcome Measures in Facial Plastic Surgery: Patient-Reported and Clinical Efficacy Measures. Arch Facial Plast Surg 10: 194-207 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2002). Minerva. BMJ 325: 606-606 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs