ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Rapid sequence intubation in Scottish urban emergency departments

C A Graham¹, D Beard², A J Oglesby³, S B Thakore⁴, J P Beale³, J Brittliff⁵, M A Johnston⁴, D W McKeown⁶, T R J Parke¹

¹ Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
² Scottish Trauma Audit Group, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
³ Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
⁴ Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
⁵ Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
⁶ Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

Correspondence to:
Correspondence:
Mr C A Graham, Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK;
colingrahamlt{at}ukonline.co.uk

Objective: Airway care is the cornerstone of resuscitation. In UK emergency department practice, this care is provided by anaesthetists and emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to determine current practice for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in a sample of emergency departments in Scotland.

Methods: Two year, multicentre, prospective observational study of endotracheal intubation in the emergency departments of seven Scottish urban teaching hospitals.

Results: 1631 patients underwent an intubation attempt in the emergency department and 735 patients satisfied the criteria for RSI. Emergency physicians intubated 377 patients and anaesthetists intubated 355 patients. There was no difference in median age between the groups but there was a significantly greater proportion of men (73.2% versus 65.3%, p=0.024) and trauma patients (48.5% versus 37.4%, p=0.003) in the anaesthetic group. Anaesthetists had a higher initial success rate (91.8% versus 83.8%, p=0.001) and achieved more good (Cormack-Lehane Grade I and II) views at laryngoscopy (94.0% versus 89.3%, p=0.039). There was a non-significant trend to more complications in the group of patients intubated by emergency physicians (8.7% versus 12.7%, p=0.104). Emergency physicians intubated a higher proportion of patients with physiological compromise (91.8% versus 86.1%, p=0.027) and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival (32.6% versus 11.3%, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Anaesthetists achieve more good views at laryngoscopy with higher initial success rates during RSI. Emergency physicians perform RSI on a higher proportion of critically ill patients and a higher proportion of patients within 15 minutes of arrival. Complications may be fewer in the anaesthetists’ group, but this could be related to differences in patient populations. Training issues for RSI and emergency airway care are discussed. Complication rates for both groups are in keeping with previous studies.

Keywords: rapid sequence intubation

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey

Pete Driscoll, Jim Wardrope
Emerg. Med. J. 2003 20: 2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wongyingsinn, M, Songarj, P, Assawinvinijkul, T (2009). A prospective observational study of tracheal intubation in an emergency department in a 2300-bed hospital of a developing country in a one-year period. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 604-608 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2009). Guidelines for difficult airway equipment in emergency departments. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 230-230 [Full Text]  
• Stafford, R A, Benger, J R, Nolan, J (2008). Self-inflating bag or Mapleson C breathing system for emergency pre-oxygenation?. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 153-155 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Symington, L, McGugam, E, Graham, C, Gordon, M, Thakore, S (2007). Training in conscious sedation techniques: meeting the recommendations of the UK Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 576-578 [Full Text]  
• Stevenson, A G M, Graham, C A, Hall, R, Korsah, P, McGuffie, A C (2007). Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: the Scottish district hospital perspective. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 394-397 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Corfield, A R, Thomas, L, Inglis, A, Hearns, S (2006). A rural emergency medical retrieval service: the first year.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 679-683 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Symington, L, Thakore, S (2006). A review of the use of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 89-93 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ollerton, J E, Parr, M J A, Harrison, K, Hanrahan, B, Sugrue, M (2006). Potential cervical spine injury and difficult airway management for emergency intubation of trauma adults in the emergency department--a systematic review. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 3-11 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Simpson, J, Munro, P T, Graham, C A (2006). Rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: 5 year trends. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 54-56 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Price, R, Inglis, A (2005). Training in anaesthesia is also an issue for nurses. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 608-608 [Full Text]  
• Steel, A. C (2005). Emergency airway management in the UK. JRSM 98: 293-294 [Full Text]  
• Graham, C. A (2005). Emergency department airway management in the UK. JRSM 98: 107-110 [Full Text]  
• Reed, M J, Dunn, M J G, McKeown, D W (2005). Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department?. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 99-102 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Oglesby, A J (2004). Should etomidate be the induction agent of choice for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department?. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 655-659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Graham, C A (2004). Advanced airway management in the emergency department: what are the training and skills maintenance needs for UK emergency physicians?. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 14-19 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

The time old RSI debate

Mark R Nash

EMJ Online, 28 Feb 2003 [Full text]