© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine
PREHOSPITAL MEDICINE
NHS Direct: consistency of triage outcomes
Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Alicia OCathain, Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK;
a.ocathain{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Objectives: To examine the consistency of triage outcomes by nurses using four types of computerised decision support software in NHS Direct.
Methods: 119 scenarios were constructed based on calls to ambulance services that had been assigned the lowest priority category by the emergency medical dispatch systems in use. These scenarios were presented to nurses working in four NHS Direct call centres using different computerised decision support software, including the NHS Clinical Assessment System.
Results: The overall level of agreement between the nurses using the four systems was "fair" rather than "moderate" or "good" (
=0.375, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.41). For example, the proportion of calls triaged to accident and emergency departments varied from 22% (26 of 119) to 44% (53 of 119). Between 21% (25 of 119) and 31% (37 of 119) of these low priority ambulance calls were triaged back to the 999 ambulance service. No system had both high sensitivity and specificity for referral to accident and emergency services.
Conclusions: There were large differences in outcome between nurses using different software systems to triage the same calls. If the variation is primarily attributable to the software then standardising on a single system will obviously eliminate this. As the calls were originally made to ambulance services and given the lowest priority, this study also suggests that if, in the future, ambulance services pass such calls to NHS Direct then at least a fifth of these may be passed back unless greater sensitivity in the selection of calls can be achieved.
Keywords: NHS Direct; triage; low priority ambulance calls
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
North, F., Varkey, P.
(2009). A retrospective study of adult telephone triage calls in a US call centre. J Telemed Telecare
15: 165-170
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Patel, M., Maconochie, I.
(2008). Triage in children. Trauma
10: 239-245
[Abstract] -
Vetter, N.
(2006). What colour is your health service organization. J Public Health (Oxf)
28: 181-182
[Full Text] -
Goode, J., Greatbatch, D., O'cathain, A., Luff, D., Hanlon, G., Strangleman, T.
(2004). Risk and the Responsible Health Consumer: The Problematics of Entitlement among Callers to NHS Direct. Critical Social Policy
24: 210-232
[Abstract]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Is it the call that needs refinement of the system? NHS Direct
- Andy Heward
- EMJ Online, 23 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
