© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The PEP respiratory monitor: a validation study
1 Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Salford, UK
2 Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
3 Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton, UK
4 Faculty of Technology, Bolton Institute, Bolton, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr C Brookes, Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK;
sue.bruno{at}srht.nhs.uk
The search for a reliable and accurate respiratory rate monitor for use in non-intubated patients has proved to be a long and fruitless one. A new device fulfilling the criteria for such a monitor has recently been described. The pyroelectric polymer (PEP) device is safe, non-invasive, and cheap. In this study the PEP device, transthoracic impedance, and standard observer counting were all compared with the existing gold standard of capnography in 12 healthy adult volunteers. Using a standard statistical technique it was shown that the PEP device performed as well as a capnograph and was more accurate than the other currently available methods of monitoring respiratory rate.
Keywords: respiratory rate; monitoring; pyroelectric polymers
Read all eLetters![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
eLetters:
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
