Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2003;20:329-331; doi:10.1136/emj.20.4.329
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Accident and emergency departments are still failing to assess asthma severity

S Harvey1, L Forbes2, D Jarvis2, J Price3, P Burney2

1 Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, UK
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, UK
3 Department of Child Health, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr L Forbes, Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London SE1 3QD;
lindsay.forbes{at}bazian.com

Objectives: To quantify the documentation of vital signs in children attending accident and emergency (A&E) for asthma and to assess whether indicators of severity were used appropriately.

Methods: Records of all children aged 3 to 14 attending A&E for the treatment of asthma in four London hospitals over a three month period were examined for documentation of heart rate, respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate, oxygen saturation, and fraction of inspired oxygen. The relation between severity indicators and whether the child was admitted or not was examined.

Results: There were 255 attendances in 229 children. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded on most attendances (94.5%, 85.5%, and 96.8%) but fraction of inspired oxygen and peak flow were recorded in few children (48.6% and 48.5%). Heart rate and respiratory rate were higher and oxygen saturation lower in children who were admitted compared with those who were not.

Conclusions: Assessment of airways obstruction is inadequate in children but when measured may be used appropriately to guide admission. There is a need for interventions to improve assessment of children attending A&E for asthma.

Keywords: medical audit; asthma; peak expiratory flow rate


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Pete Driscoll, Jim Wardrope
Emerg. Med. J. 2003 20: 303. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Snooks, H, Halter, M, Palmer, Y, Booth, H, Moore, F (2005). Hearing half the message? A re-audit of the care of patients with acute asthma by emergency ambulance crews in London. Qual Saf Health Care 14: 455-458 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2004). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 96-96 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

There is more to assessing severity than PEFR
Andrew P Webster
EMJ Online, 31 Jul 2003 [Full text]
Peak Flow is rarely important in the decision to admit
Marcin A Sosnowski
EMJ Online, 2 Feb 2004 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs