Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2003;20:367; doi:10.1136/emj.20.4.367
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

BEST EVIDENCE TOPIC REPORT

Clinical probability scoring and pulmonary embolism

Ged Brown, Specialist Registrar and Kerstin Hogg, Clinical Research Fellow

Department of Emergency Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; kevin.mackway-jones:man.ac.uk

Report by Ged Brown, Specialist Registrar
Checked by Kerstin Hogg, Clinical Research Fellow

ABSTRACT

A short cut review was carried out to establish the diagnostic utility of clinical probability scoring in stratifying the risk of pulmonary embolus. A total of 938 papers were found using the reported search, of which three presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. A clinical bottom line is stated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.