ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Predictors of falls in a high risk population: results from the prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET)

J C T Close¹, R Hooper², E Glucksman³, S H D Jackson¹ and C G Swift¹

¹ Clinical Age Research Unit, Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, King’s College, London, UK
² Department of Public Health Medicine, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine King’s College
³ Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J C T Close, King’s College Hospital (Dulwich), East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8PT, UK;
jacqueline.close{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objectives: The prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET) provides evidence of the benefits of structured interdisciplinary assessment of older people presenting to the accident and emergency department with a fall. However, the service implications of implementing this effective intervention are significant. This study therefore examined risk factors from PROFET and used these to devise a practical approach to streamlining referrals from accident and emergency departments to specialist falls services.

Methods: Logistic regression analysis was used in the control group to identify patients with an increased risk of falling in the absence of any intervention. The derived predictors were investigated to see whether they also predicted loss to follow up. A second regression analysis was undertaken to test for interaction with intervention.

Results: Significant positive predictors of further falls were; history of falls in the previous year (OR 1.5 (95%CI 1.1 to 1.9)), falling indoors (OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.1 to 5.2)), and inability to get up after a fall (OR 5.5 (95%CI 2.3 to 13.0)). Negative predictors were moderate alcohol consumption (OR 0.55 (95%CI 0.28 to 1.1)), a reduced abbreviated mental test score (OR 0.7 (95%CI 0.53 to 0.93)), and admission to hospital as a result of the fall (OR 0.26 (95%CI 0.11 to 0.61)). A history of falls (OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.0 to 1.3)), falling indoors (OR 3.2 (95%CI 1.5 to 6.6)) and a reduced abbreviated mental test score (OR 1.3 (95%CI 1.0 to 1.6)) were found to predict loss to follow up.

Conclusions: The study has focused on a readily identifiable high risk group of people presenting at a key interface between the primary and secondary health care sectors. Analysis of derived predictors offers a practical risk based approach to streamlining referrals that is consistent with an attainable level of service commitment.

Keywords: falls; prevention; randomised controlled trial; risk factors

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey

Pete Driscoll and Jim Wardope
Emerg. Med. J. 2003 20: 397. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Russell, M. A., Hill, K. D., Day, L. M., Blackberry, I., Gurrin, L. C., Dharmage, S. C. (2009). Development of the Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (FROP-Com) screening tool. Age Ageing 38: 40-46 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Russell, M. A., Hill, K. D., Blackberry, I., Day, L. M., Dharmage, S. C. (2008). The reliability and predictive accuracy of the falls risk for older people in the community assessment (FROP-Com) tool. Age Ageing 37: 634-639 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Donaldson, M. G., Sobolev, B., Kuramoto, L., Cook, W. L., Khan, K. M., Janssen, P. A. (2007). Utility of the Mean Cumulative Function in the Analysis of Fall Events. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62: 415-419 [Abstract] [Full Text]