© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine
PREHOSPITAL CARE
Retrospective study into the delivery of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation to "999" callers
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr A Heward
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, 220 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8SD, UK; andy.heward{at}lond-amb.nhs.uk
Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an essential part of the chain of survival, with early administration directly affecting the patients chance of survival. Pre-arrival telephone CPR instructions provide callers who have no CPR training on how to undertake this intervention. With the emergency medical dispatcher unable to see the caller or the patient, it is possible that problems will arise, presenting barriers, that stop the caller undertaking effective CPR.
Objective: To examine how commonly barriers to telephone CPR occur and whether this affects the time it takes to perform the intervention.
Method: A retrospective quantitative analysis was undertaken using a convenience sample of 100 emergency calls. Calls were identified in the emergency control room as cardiac arrests and confirmed by the responding paramedics as cardiac arrests. The calls were listened to, established if CPR instructions were given, if the instructions were followed, if anything hindered the instructions undertaken, and the time taken to reach key points.
Findings: 18 cases had bystander CPR administered. An additional 56 of cases had CPR instructions provided but "barriers" in 49% (n = 27) hindered the effectiveness of these. The median time to recognition of cardiac arrest was 40 seconds, with time to first ventilation being 4 min 10 s and time to first compression 5 min 30 s. These times were notably higher in those cases where a barrier to effective telephone CPR existed.
Conclusions: Barriers to undertaking telephone CPR occurred with a high degree of frequency. These barriers affect the ability of the caller to perform rapid and effective telephone CPR.
Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; EMD, emergency medical dispatcher; t-CPR, telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation; AMPDS, Advance Medical Priority Dispatch System
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Trankler, U., Hagen, O., Horsch, A.
(2008). Video quality of 3G videophones for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Telemed Telecare
14: 396-400
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Paal, P, Falk, M, Gruber, E, Beikircher, W, Sumann, G, Demetz, F, Ellerton, J, Wenzel, V, Brugger, H
(2008). Retention of mouth-to-mouth, mouth-to-mask and mouth-to-face shield ventilation. Emerg. Med. J.
25: 42-45
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Marcovitch, H.
(2004). What's new this month in BMJ Journals. BMJ
328: 856-856
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
