Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2004;21:306-310; doi:10.1136/emj.2003.010165
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Randomised, controlled outcome study of active mobilisation compared with collar therapy for whiplash injury

M Schnabel1, R Ferrari2, T Vassiliou1, G Kaluza3

1 Department of Trauma, Philipps University of Marburg, Klinikum Lahnberge, Marburg, Germany
2 Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
3 Department of Medical Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R Ferrari
Room 2G2.06, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7; rferrari{at}shaw.ca

Objectives: Standard therapy in Germany for acute whiplash injury has traditionally included a soft collar (cervical orthosis), an approach that is passive compared with early exercise and mobilisation. The purpose of this study is to examine the recovery in the first six weeks of groups of acute whiplash injury patients subjected to two different treatment approaches, the traditional approach of a collar compared with active, early mobilisation.

Methods: Between August 1997 and February 2000 a randomised clinical trial with a total of 200 patients was performed. A total of 97 were randomly assigned to a collar therapy group, and 103 to the exercise group, treated by a physiotherapist. Study participants recorded average pain and disability twice (baseline and six week follow up) during a one week period by diary, using numeric visual analogue (VAS) rating scales ranging from 0 to 10.

Results: The initial mean VAS pain intensity and VAS disability reported by the collar therapy group and the exercise group showed no statistical difference. The mean VAS pain rating reported by the collar therapy group after six weeks was 1.60 and mean VAS disability rating was 1.56. The mean VAS pain intensity of the exercise group was 1.04 and mean VAS disability was 0.92. These differences between the groups were both significant, as was the reduction in the prevalence of symptoms in the exercise therapy group compared with the collar group at six weeks.

Conclusions: Early exercise therapy is superior to the collar therapy in reducing pain intensity and disability for whiplash injury.

Keywords: whiplash injury; neck pain; cervical collar; physiotherapy

Abbreviations: VAS, visual analogue scale; WAD, whiplash associated disorder


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Schofferman, J., Bogduk, N., Slosar, P. (2007). Chronic Whiplash and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15: 596-606 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs