© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Use of the patient at risk scores in the emergency department: a preliminary study
1 Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
2 Emergency Department, Taunton and Somerset Hospital, Musgrove Park, Taunton, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Miss J E Rees
Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Wonford Site, Bovemoors Lane, Exeter, Devon EX2 5DF, UK; jakrees{at}doctors.org.uk
Objectives: To assess the feasibility of using a modified patient at risk (PAR) scoring system in the emergency department.
Methods: Modified PAR scores were calculated for 30 triage category 1 and 2 patients on arrival in the department and at 15 minutes after the initial resuscitation was underway using observation datasheets designed for this project.
Results: Three patients (10%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Twenty six patients (88%) were admitted to a general ward and one was discharged. Fifty per cent of the patients had a PAR score of 3 or more on arrival. Eighty seven per cent of the general ward patients had a PAR score that was stable or improved during the first 15 minutes of resuscitation. The other three ward patients, whose scores deteriorated, were assessed in the emergency department by the appropriate teams and deemed appropriate for ward beds. Two of the three ICU patients deteriorated in the resuscitation room. The third ICU patient maintained a PAR score of 2 but had such overwhelming injuries that ICU was the only option.
Discussion: Serial PAR scores are far more informative than isolated scores. This study suggests that serial PAR scores could be used in three ways in the emergency department. Firstly, in the assessment of individual patients and their response to initial resuscitation. Secondly, as a guide to the need further specialist assessment before leaving the emergency department. Finally, as an audit tool to measure the effectiveness of initial treatments in large numbers of patients during the initial resuscitation.
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; PAR, patient at risk
Keywords: patient risk; resuscitation
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Egdell, P, Finlay, L, Pedley, D K
(2008). The PAWS score: validation of an early warning scoring system for the initial assessment of children in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J.
25: 745-749
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Subbe, C P, Slater, A, Menon, D, Gemmell, L
(2006). Validation of physiological scoring systems in the accident and emergency department.. Emerg. Med. J.
23: 841-845
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
