Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2005;22:795-798; doi:10.1136/emj.2004.017822
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Emergency department organisation of critical care transfers in the UK

A Stevenson1, C Fiddler2, M Craig3, A Gray4

1 Emergency Department, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
2 Department of Medicine, Borders’ General Hospital, Melrose, UK
3 Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
4 Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Gray
Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; alasdair.gray{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk

Objectives: Transport of the critically ill patient to or from the emergency department (ED) is a frequent occurrence. This study was designed to determine whether UK EDs currently have appropriate equipment, monitoring, staff training systems, and processes of care for transportation of the critically ill patient.

Methods: A postal questionnaire regarding ED transfer patients was sent to 247 UK EDs, followed by repeat mailing and telephone follow up of non-responders.

Results: In total, 139 EDs (56%) responded. An estimated 20–30 critically ill patients are transferred from and <20 are received by each ED annually. Processes of care are poorly developed; only 79 EDs (56%) have transfer guidelines available. Audit of transfers is ongoing in 59 EDs (42%), and critical incident reporting is ongoing in 122 (88%). There is a lack of immediately available transport equipment; for example, 17 EDs (12%) have no transport ventilator, 9 (6%) have no transport monitor, and 9 (6%) have no syringe pump. Transport equipment is invariably not standardised. Anaesthetic staff of specialist registrar (74 doctors; 53%) or senior house officer (36 doctors; 26%) grades carry out the majority of ED transfers accompanied by a D or E grade nurse. Both invariably have no formal transfer training.

Conclusions: This study highlights inadequacies in provision of equipment and monitoring during interhospital transfer from the ED. Training and processes of care for transport of the critically ill are also suboptimum. Many departments are currently reviewing these processes to formalise and improve transfer training procedures and protocols.

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department

Keywords: Critical care transfers; emergency department transfer; critical care networks


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs