Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2005;22:863-866; doi:10.1136/emj.2004.020818
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Has the assessment of isolated ankle injuries altered since 1993?

T Locker1,2, M Tryfonidis2 and S Mason1,2

1 Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, UK
2 Emergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
T Locker
Medical Care Research Unit, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4dA; t.locker{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Background: Performance of emergency departments in England and Wales has declined in recent years. Data from the authors’ department has shown that junior doctors now see fewer patients and spend longer over their assessment than was the case previously. This study aimed to determine how the assessment of patients with isolated ankle injuries changed over an 11 year period.

Methods: A retrospective case note review was conducted. Data regarding the duration of assessment, clinical information recorded, investigations, and treatments were retrieved.

Results: During the period studied 13 555 patients presented with isolated ankle injuries; case notes of 550 of these patients were reviewed in the present study. Linear regression demonstrated that the median length of time from arrival in the department until seen by a clinician increased (b = 3.0 min/year, 95% CI 0.7 to 5.2, p = 0.015), but the median length of time from seeing a clinician until leaving the department was unchanged (b = 0.6 min/year, 95% CI –1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.475). More clinical information was being recorded, but the proportion of patients having radiographs of the ankle (b = 0.24% per year, 95% CI –1.40% to 1.87%, p = 0.751) or in whom a fracture was diagnosed (b = –0.20% per year, 95% CI –1.59% to 1.19% per year, p = 0.752) remained unchanged.

Conclusion: It appears from this study that the duration of assessment of patients with minor injuries is not changing although this result should be interpreted cautiously.

Keywords: ankle injury; emergency department; clinical assessment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs