HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by D’Costa, H Articles by Wilson, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by D’Costa, H Articles by Wilson, M Topic Collections Relevant Article

Pitfalls in the clinical diagnosis of vertebral fractures: a case series in which posterior midline tenderness was absent

Emergency Departments, Horton and John Radcliffe Hospitals, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G George
Emergency Department, Horton Hospital, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford Road, Banbury, Oxon OX16 9AL; grizelda.george{at}orh.nhs.uk

Objective: There is widespread belief among doctors that posterior midline tenderness is virtually a prerequisite for spinal fracture in alert, sober patients without any painful distracting injury or neurological deficit. This paper examines and challenges this belief.

Methods and results: We present three patients in whom significant thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures were missed, or were thought to be "old", because of lack of posterior midline tenderness. We also present two further patients, one with a lumbar spine fracture and one with a cervical spine fracture, in whom posterior midline tenderness was absent but in whom the correct diagnosis was made. All these patients were sober and fully alert and none had a neurological deficit or a painful distracting injury.

Conclusion: The absence of posterior midline tenderness does not exclude significant spinal injury. We suggest that patients should satisfy both the Canadian and British guidelines before it is decided that imaging of the cervical spine is unnecessary.

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; NEXUS, National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study

Keywords: spinal fractures; posterior midline tenderness

Relevant Article

Primary Survey

J Wardrope and P Driscoll
Emerg. Med. J. 2005 22: 313. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B Barry, G George, H Oag, and B Shafighian Fractures of the atlas: can we rely on the NICE guidelines for imaging the cervical spine after head injury? Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2006; 23(9): e52 - e52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]