Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2005;22:541-543; doi:10.1136/emj.2004.017160
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

CT or not CT—that is the question. Whether ‘tis better to evaluate clinically and x ray than to undertake a CT head scan!

D M Macgregor1, L McKie2

1 Accident & Emergency Department, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, Scotland
2 Aberdeen University School of Medicine, Aberdeen, Scotland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Diana M Macgregor
Accident & Emergency Department, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZG, Scotland; diana.macgregor{at}nhs.net

Objective: To evaluate the usage of computed tomography (CT) head scanning in children at the Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital after the publication of the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the management of head injury.

Methods: The Accident and Emergency case records of all children presenting with a head injury over a three month period were reviewed and the number of attendances, radiographs, and CT head scans undertaken were noted. Also noted was the number of additional CT head scans that would have been performed if the NICE guidelines had been rigidly followed.

Results: Five hundred and thirty seven children were included in the study: 67% were boys. Two hundred and ten (39%) had skull radiographs: six demonstrated skull fractures and eight (1.5%) underwent CT head scan, with one positive report of a skull fracture. There were no reports of intracranial abnormalities. Ninety nine (18.4%) were admitted. Strictly applying all the NICE criteria for CT scanning would have resulted in an additional 54 patients being scanned.

Conclusion: Rigid adherence to the NICE guidelines in all children with head injuries would have resulted in an almost eightfold increase in CT head scans performed. None of these children had clinical signs of intracranial injury and would have been exposed to a large amount of ionising radiation. The use of guidelines in practice must always be considered in conjunction with clinical judgement.

Abbreviations: A&E, Accident and Emergency; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; NICE, National Institute of Clinical Excellence; RACH, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital

Keywords: child; head; injury; CT; radiograph


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Leaman, A M, Rysdale, E (2006). Can we abolish skull x rays for head injury?. Arch. Dis. Child. 91: 374-374 [Full Text]  
  • (2005). Lucina. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 1100-1100 [Full Text]  
  • (2005). Minerva. BMJ 331: 584-584 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

NICE head injury guidelines – the need for further studies before we judge them
Nitin Mukerji
EMJ Online, 26 Oct 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs