ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Detection of hypertension in the emergency department

J Fleming, C Meredith, J Henry

Academic Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr J Fleming
Academic Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK; john.fleming{at}imperial.ac.uk

Objectives: To assess whether an emergency department (ED) is a suitable location for the targeted screening of hypertension.

Methods: This was a prospective targeted screening study based at the ED of an inner city teaching hospital. Non-acute subjects over 18 years were recruited consecutively from the "minors" section of the ED and invited to participate. All subjects had their blood pressure measured twice. A verbal numerical pain score (PS) out of 10 using a visual analogue scale was obtained. Those with a mean systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or a mean diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg (WHO JNC stage 1 hypertension) were invited for a subsequent follow up measurement. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with hypertension at follow up. The secondary outcome measure was the correlation between a subject’s mid blood pressure (MBP) and their PS.

Results: In total, 765 subjects were tested, of whom 213 subjects were hypertensive at presentation (28.7%). After excluding those on anti-hypertensive medication (n = 43; 5.6%) and those who were non-UK residents (n = 44; 5.8%), 126 subjects were invited for follow up, of whom 51 subjects actually attended (40% attendance, 6.6% of study population). The MBP of those who re-attended was significantly lower than at presentation (p<0.001); 39 subjects (5% of the study population, 76.4% of those attending follow up) remained hypertensive. There was no correlation between a subject’s PS and their MBP (Pearson correlation coefficient = –0.02). A 10/10 PS was associated with an 8.4 mmHg rise in MBP compared to the mean MBP of subjects with PS 0–9 (p<0.1). Of those originally presenting with PS>5/10, 62% still had hypertension at follow up when the painful stimulus was significantly reduced (mean PS = 0.6).

Conclusion: The ED provides an opportunity for identifying those individuals with hypertension who may otherwise remain undiagnosed. Caution is advised when diagnosing hypertension in those individuals suffering from anxiety and/or acute severe pain on presentation.

Abbreviations: BHS, British Hypertension Society; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ED, emergency department; GP, general practitioner; MBP, mid blood pressure; PS, pain score; SBP, systolic blood pressure

Keywords: Emergency; hypertension; opportunistic; prevalence; prevention; screening; pain

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey

Jonathan Wyatt
Emerg. Med. J. 2005 22: 612a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sood, T, Sally, D, Spencer, N, Banerjee, A, Hinchley, G (2008). Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 428-430 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Collins, K, Gough, S, Clancy, M (2008). Screening for hypertension in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 196-199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smith, S M (2006). Screening for hypertension in the emergency department.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 325-325 [Full Text]  
• Lee, J (2005). Should emergency departments really be screening for hypertension?. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 640-640 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Screening for hypertension in the ED

Simon M Smith

EMJ Online, 6 Sep 2005 [Full text]

Rural Poor!

Alex F Hieatt

EMJ Online, 21 Sep 2005 [Full text]