Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:906-910; doi:10.1136/emj.2006.038877
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care

J Roukema1, E W Steyerberg2, A van Meurs3, M Ruige3, J van der Lei4, H A Moll5

1 Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 Haga Hospital, Juliana Children’s Hospital Site, The Hague, The Netherlands
4 Department of Medical Informatics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
5 Department of General Paediatrics, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
H A Moll
Department of General Paediatrics, Room SP 1540, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB Rotterdam, The Netherlands;h.a.moll{at}erasmusmc.nl

Objective: To assess the validity of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) in paediatric emergency care, using information on vital signs, resource utilisation and hospitalisation.

Methods: Patients were eligible if they had attended the emergency department of a large inner-city hospital in The Netherlands from August 2003 to November 2004 and were <16 years of age. A representative sample of 1065 patients was drawn from 18 469 eligible patients. The originally assigned MTS urgency levels were compared with resource utilisation, hospitalisation and a predefined reference classification for true urgency, based on vital signs, resource utilisation and follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity and percentage of overtriage and undertriage of the MTS were calculated.

Results: The number of patients who used more than two resources increased with a higher level of MTS urgency. The percentage of hospital admissions increased with the increase in level of urgency, from 1% in the non-urgent patients to 54% in emergent patients. According to the reference classification, the sensitivity of the MTS to detect emergent/very urgent cases was 63%, and the specificity was 78%. Undertriage occurred in 15% of patients, of which 96% were by one urgency category lower than the reference classification. Overtriage occurred in 40%, mostly in lower MTS categories. In 36% of these cases, the MTS classified two or more urgency categories higher than the reference classification.

Conclusions: The MTS has moderate sensitivity and specificity in paediatric emergency care. Specific modifications of the MTS should be considered in paediatric emergency care to reduce overtriage, while maintaining sensitivity in the highest urgency categories.

Abbreviations: MTS, Manchester Triage System


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2006 23: 891. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sandell, J M, Maconochie, I K, Jewkes, F (2009). Prehospital paediatric emergency care: paediatric triage. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 767-768 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van der Wulp, I, Schrijvers, A J P, van Stel, H F (2009). Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 506-509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Patel, M., Maconochie, I. (2008). Triage in children. Trauma 10: 239-245 [Abstract]  
  • Veen, M v., Steyerberg, E. W, Ruige, M., Meurs, A. H J v., Roukema, J., Lei, J. v. d., Moll, H. A (2008). Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study. BMJ 337: a1501-a1501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van der Wulp, I, van Baar, M E, Schrijvers, A J P (2008). Reliability and validity of the Manchester Triage System in a general emergency department patient population in the Netherlands: results of a simulation study. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 431-434 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs