Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:911-914; doi:10.1136/emj.2006.039339
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Review of calls to NHS Direct related to attendance in the paediatric emergency department

B Stewart1, R Fairhurst2, J Markland3, O Marzouk1

1 Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
2 NHS Direct North West Coast, UK
3 Clinical Audit Department, Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
B Stewart
Accident and Emergency Department, Royal Liverpool Children’s NHS Trust, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, Liverpool LA12AP, UK; briar.stewart{at}rlc.nhs.uk

Objective: To examine the outcomes of calls to NHS Direct (NHS-D) in relation to attendance at the accident and emergency (A&E) department.

Design: A prospective collection of data about consecutive calls to NHS-D North West Coast was matched with attendances at the A&E department over a period of 3 months.

Setting: NHS-D Regional Trust and a large urban paediatric A&E department.

Patients: Children and young adults aged <16 years living in local postal code areas.

Main outcome measures: To examine (1) whether advice given by NHS-D was followed and (2) the differences in disease severity and necessity of attendance of patients referred by NHS-D and those referred by general practitioners and self-presenters.

Results: The relationship between the advice given and subsequent action is complex. Only 70% of calls advised to attend the A&E department did so. A further 1% (176) were advised not to attend the A&E department did in fact attend the department. Patients referred by NHS-D represented only 3.2% of department attendances. There was little difference in the triage categories of the presenting groups, but there were significantly less admissions (p<0.01) in the NHS-D group.

Conclusions: Delivering telephone advice about illness severity in children is difficult as visual clues are so important. More collaborative prospective studies are needed, including with primary care, to understand families’ choices, and to refine and assess NHS-D’s ability to discriminate those requiring further clinical assessment.

Abbreviations: A&E, accident and emergency; NHS-D, NHS Direct; RLCH, Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2006 23: 891. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sadler, M, Challiner, J (2008). Calls to NHS Direct. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 59-59 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Response to Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 911
Jean Challiner, et al.
EMJ Online, 30 Jan 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs