Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:922-923; doi:10.1136/emj.2006.040956
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

SHORT REPORT

The safety of single-physician procedural sedation in the emergency department

K Hogan1, A Sacchetti1, L Aman2, D Opiela3

1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
2 AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center Mainland Division, Pomona, New Jersey, USA
3 EmCare Northeast, Horsham, New Jersey, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
A Sacchetti
Department of Emergency Medicine, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, 1600 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA; a.sacchetti{at}att.net

ABSTRACT

Background: Pevious research has shown the safety of procedural sedation in the emergency department in university settings involving multiple emergency physicians.

Objective: To examine sedation in the emergency department conducted by a single emergency physician with monitoring by the emergency nurse.

Methods: The Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department Registry is a prospective observational database of procedural sedation cases directed by the emergency physicians. Among other parameters, the registry tracts whether emergency physicians or emergency nurses monitored patient sedation. The incidence of complications and outcomes were compared between these two monitoring groups.

Results: 1028 procedural sedations were performed on 977 patients at 14 sites. In 885 (86.1%) cases the emergency physician directed the sedation, and performed the procedure with monitoring by the emergency nurse. Complications occurred in 42 (4.1%) patients, 35 (4.0%) EN monitored patients and 6 (4.2%) EP monitored patients (p>0.7). Procedures were successful in 863 (97.5%) cases monitored by emergency nurses and in 140 (97.9%) patients monitored by emergency physicians (p>0.7).

Conclusion: Procedural sedation in the emergency department performed by a single emergency physician is safe and effective.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2006 23: 891. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Adams, S T, Woods, C, Lyall, H, Higson, M (2008). Standards of practice in UK emergency departments before, during and after conscious sedation. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 728-731 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vardy, J M, Dignon, N, Mukherjee, N, Sami, D M, Balachandran, G, Taylor, S (2008). Audit of the safety and effectiveness of ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 579-582 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs