Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:286-290; doi:10.1136/emj.2005.024695
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Waiting and interaction times for patients in a developing country accident and emergency department

K Banerjea1, A O Carter2

1 Accident and Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, Barbados
2 School of Clinical Medicine and Research, University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, Barbados

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Anne O Carter
School of Clinical Medicine and Research, University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, Barbados; annecarter{at}uwichill.edu.bb

Objective: To determine the interaction and waiting times of patients in Barbados Queen Elizabeth Hospital Accident and Emergency Department (A&E), identify their determinants, and compare them to international benchmarks.

Methods: Trained research assistants monitored all patients attending A&E during a one week period in 2003. The time in and out of each step in the process of care was recorded along with demographic data, diagnosis, and acuity. Time elapsed was calculated for various steps in care and compared to international benchmarks. Determinants of timely care were identified.

Results: Of 882 eligible A&E patients, 675 (77%) had accurate data and were entered into the study. Interaction times were short, with median total interaction time 13 (IQR 9–21) minutes. Waiting times were long ranging from median 6.5 (IQR 2–22) minutes for registration to 213 (IQR 154–316) minutes for lab results. Of concern was a median wait of 10 (IQR 2–46) minutes for triage and 178 (IQR 105–305) minutes to be seen by a doctor. Mean total length of stay was 377 (SD 261) minutes compared to US benchmark of 90 minutes. All other waiting times were at least twice US benchmarks. Paediatrics cases and children aged 0–11 years had the shortest waiting times and length of stay, whereas medicine patients and those over 49 years had the longest. Those with highest acuity had the shortest waiting times and length of stay.

Conclusions: The A&E could improve patient care processes by shortening waiting times, especially for laboratory results, triage, and seeing a doctor, particularly for older medicine patients.

Abbreviations: A&E, accident and emergency; ED, emergency department; LOS, length of stay; LWT, left without treatment; QEH, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; RA, research assistant; TAT, turn around time

Keywords: emergency medicine; quality care; timely care; benchmarking


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs