Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:444-445; doi:10.1136/emj.2005.026450
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

What percentages of patients are suitable for prehospital thrombolysis?

N Castle1, R Owen2, R Vincent3, N Ineson4

1 Emergency Medical Care and Rescue, Durban Institute of Technology, Durban, South Africa
2 Surrey Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Banstead, Surrey, UK
3 Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
4 Frimley Park Hospital NHS Trust, Frimley, Surrey, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
N Castle
Frimley Park Hospital NHS Trust, Frimley, Surrey, UK; nicholas.castle{at}fph-tr.nhs.uk

Objective: To apply the Joint Royal College Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) checklist to patients who were deemed eligible for thrombolytic therapy on arrival in an Accident & Emergency Department (A&E) to determine the proportion suitable for prehospital thrombolysis.

Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis.

Methods: The clinical notes of all patients thrombolysed in an A&E department in a year were reviewed against the JRCALC guidelines for prehospital thrombolysis.

Results: 14.2% of patients eligible for thrombolysis in a district general hospital were deemed suitable for prehospital thrombolysis according to the JRCALC criteria. The most common exclusion criteria were hyper/hypotension (50%), onset of symptoms (pain) >6 h previously (41.7%), or age >75 years (37%). Two or more contraindications to prehospital thrombolysis were present in 63.9% of patients.

Conclusion: The JRCALC guidelines are an effective tool for identifying patients with potential contraindications to thrombolysis.

Keywords: bolus; JRCALC; prehospital; thrombolysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2006 23: 415. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Khan, S N, Murray, P, McCormick, L, Sharples, L S, Salahshouri, P, Scott, J, Schofield, P M (2009). Paramedic-led prehospital thrombolysis is safe and effective: the East Anglian experience. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 452-455 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McLean, S, Egan, G, Connor, P, Flapan, A D (2008). Collaborative decision-making between paramedics and CCU nurses based on 12-lead ECG telemetry expedites the delivery of thrombolysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 370-374 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Castle, N R, Owen, R C, Hann, M (2007). Is there still a place for emergency department thrombolysis following the introduction of the amended Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee criteria for thrombolysis?. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 843-845 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs