Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2006;23:550-553; doi:10.1136/emj.2005.032698
© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High dose methylprednisolone in the immediate management of acute, blunt spinal cord injury: what is the current practice in emergency departments, spinal units, and neurosurgical units in the UK?

A E Frampton1 and C A Eynon2

1 Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary and Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
2 Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit, Wessex Neurological Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Frampton
Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK; anneframpton2003{at}yahoo.co.uk

Background: The National Acute Spinal Cord Injuries Studies and the Cochrane Review advocate the administration of high dose methylprednisolone following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. However, controversy surrounds its use and approaches between different units are often inconsistent.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all emergency departments receiving major trauma and all specialist neurosurgical and spinal units in the UK to determine the current practice regarding the use of high dose methylprednisolone in the immediate management of acute, blunt spinal cord injuries.

Results: Of 250 emergency departments, 187 replied to the questionnaire. Twelve of the 26 departments with a neurosurgical or spinal service on site stated they received consistent advice from specialist teams. Sixty four departments had a written policy regarding the treatment of spinal injuries, which in 51 departments contained advice about the administration of methylprednisolone. Of the 128 departments who gave methylprednisolone, 88 did so only on the advice of a specialist team, with the remaining 40 giving steroids immediately on identification of the injury. Ten out of 11 spinal units replied, of whom only two advised the used of steroids. Of the 34 neurosurgical units approached, seven out of 17 responders had a policy recommending the use of steroids. Of the 10 units who did not consistently recommend the use of steroids, seven had practise that varied between consultants.

Conclusion: Currently practice varies in the UK regarding the immediate use of methylprednisolone after spinal injury. Clear guidelines need to be established to achieve a more consistent approach.

Keywords: methylprednisolone; spinal cord injury; steroids


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lindberg, D. M., Lindsell, C. J., Shapiro, R. A. (2008). Variability in Expert Assessments of Child Physical Abuse Likelihood. Pediatrics 121: e945-e953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Post-Hoc does not Equal Ad-Hoc
Pilar Laborde Lahoz
EMJ Online, 2 Oct 2006 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs