Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2007;24:25-30; doi:10.1136/emj.2006.039974
© 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The impacts and outcomes of implementing head injury guidelines: clinical experience in Thailand

Sanguansin Ratanalert1, Thirawat Kornsilp2, Nakarin Chintragoolpradub3, Suwit Kongchoochouy4

1 Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla 90112, Thailand
2 Ranod Hospital, Songkla 90140, Thailand
3 Sathingphra Hospital, Songkla 90190,Thailand
4 Rattaphum Hospital, Songkla 90180, Thailand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Sanguansin Ratanalert
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla 90112, Thailand;sanguansin.r{at}psu.ac.th

Objective: To describe the impact of implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for head injury in a trauma referral system in Songkla province, Thailand.

Methods: The CPG was developed by a local multidisciplinary team and implemented using multi-faceted methods. The outcome of patients with head injury from three community hospitals and a university hospital (Songklanagarind Hospital) was reported in terms of "talk and deteriorate" patients and a "poor" outcome for patients with severe head injury. Changes to clinical practice were observed where the guidelines were implemented.

Results: 1000 patients with head injury were enrolled from 1st August 2005 to 15th January 2006. The incidence of "talk and deteriorate" patients was 10.5% and a poor outcome was noted in 35.5% of patients with severe head injury, similar to the results of a previous study in Songklanagarind Hospital (p>0.05). Following implementation of the guidelines, 19.8% of patients underwent CT scanning with similar outcomes for alert patients with and without basal skull fracture (p>0.05). The clinician—nurse relationship also improved and there was closer collaboration between hospitals. Short observation in community hospitals for repeat neurological examination may be an appropriate strategy for management of some patients with minor head injury.

Conclusions: Local ownership, an appropriate implementation strategy and working as a multidisciplinary team are key factors for success in implementing the CPG. Basal skull fracture may not be an absolute criterion for CT imaging of the head. Further initiatives will be developed in response to the incidence of "talk and deteriorate" patients.

Abbreviations: CPG, clinical practice guidelines; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; LOC, loss of consciousness

Keywords: guideline; head injury; impact; implementation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Geoff Hughes
Emerg. Med. J. 2007 24: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs