PREHOSPITAL CARE
The optimum reperfusion pathway for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: development of a decision framework
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J Kendall
Emergency Department, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay Park Road, Bristol BS16 1LE, UK;jason.kendall{at}nbt.nhs.uk
There is currently much debate about the relative roles of pharmacological reperfusion (ie, thrombolysis) and mechanical reperfusion (ie, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in the management of patients with acute ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whilst the scientific debate is reaching some resolution in terms of appropriate interpretation of the evidence base, there are still significant resource issues within the UK that limit our ability to implement gold standard reperfusion therapy.
Current evidence supports the use of one or other strategy in certain situations depending on various patient-related and logistical factors. This paper reviews the literature and builds the case for developing a strategic approach which includes both mechanical and pharmacological interventions, proposing that these are not mutually exclusiveindeed, that an approach which excludes one of these interventions will not be to the benefit of all patients. There is also a discussion of the role of rescue PPCI, facilitated PPCI and early post thrombolysis angiography in the management of STEMI.
Cardiac networks throughout the UK are developing strategies to improve access to these interventions and this paper offers advice on the logical selection of interventions for reperfusion in the context of a clinical decision framework that is evidence-based, pragmatic and develops through a series of scenarios with increasing availability of resources. Four sequential scenarios are presented: the first to set the scene is largely consigned to history; the last, as of yet, is not robustly achievable within the UK, but represents the "optimum reperfusion pathway", to which most cardiac networks are striving. Most of us currently find ourselves in a period of change between the two and will relate to either scenario two or three.
Abbreviations: PHT, prehospital thrombolysis; PPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Quinn, T
(2008). Other clinicians play a part in expediting reperfusion. Emerg. Med. J.
25: 122-122
[Full Text] -
Cooke, M. W
(2007). Do we need new clinical standards in management of acute myocardial infarction?. Emerg. Med. J.
24: 315-316
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- There are other clinicians involved in expediting reperfusion
- Tom Quinn
- EMJ Online, 9 Jan 2007 [Full text]
- Faculty Position Statement
- Roderick Mackenzie
- EMJ Online, 16 Jan 2007 [Full text]
- Re: There are other clinicians involved in expediting reperfusion
- Jason M Kendall
- EMJ Online, 20 Sep 2007 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
