Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2007;24:100-102; doi:10.1136/emj.2006.043224
© 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Development of acute chest pain services in the UK

Elizabeth Cross1, Steven How1, Steve Goodacre2

1 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrsE Cross
Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court,30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; e.a.cross{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Background: In 2001, a survey of emergency departments in the UK showed wide variation in the management of acute undifferentiated chest pain. There has since been substantial development of chest pain services and research into chest pain units (CPUs).

Aim: To determine whether practice had changed in 2006.

Methods: All emergency departments in the UK were surveyed by postal questionnaire to the lead clinician or first named consultant.

Results: Responses were received from 192 of 253 (76%) departments. 25 (10%) stated they had a CPU, although 8 (32%) of these were set up in trials. Many CPUs provided care that was similar to that provided by hospitals without a CPU, with 76% using 10–12 h troponin and 29% only providing delayed access to exercise tolerance testing (up to 2–3 weeks after attendance). Over all departments, the proportion with access to exercise testing had more than doubled between 2001 and 2006, from 21% to 49% (94/190), although only a minority (16%) were able to provide this immediately or within the next working day. Use of departmental guidelines for patients with chest pain had increased from 42% to 72% of departments. Use of troponins increased from 52% to 96%, whereas use of creatine kinase MB decreased from 54% to 31% of departments. Availability of short-stay facilities had more than doubled from 21% to 59%.

Conclusions: Formal development of CPUs has been limited and mostly restricted to trials. However, there has been substantial informal and ad hoc development of acute chest pain services. Development of chest pain services in the UK is progressing in a disorganised way.

Abbreviations: CPU, chest pain unit; CK-MB, creatine kinase muscle and brain subunits; ETT, exercise tolerance tests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Miro, OŇ, Bragulat, E, Sanchez, M (2008). Are European EDs unenthusiastic about chest pain units?. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 59-60 [Full Text]  
  • Arnold, J., Goodacre, S., Morris, F., on behalf of the ESCAPE Research Team, (2007). Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE Trial. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 462-466 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs