ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction
1 Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2 Warwick Medical School, Warwickshire, UK
3 Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4 School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southhampton, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
M Chalder
Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, 25 Belgrave Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 2AA, UK; melanie.chalder{at}bristol.ac.uk
Objectives: To explore the impact of establishing walk-in centres alongside emergency departments on patient choice, preference and satisfaction.
Methods: A controlled, mixed-method study comparing 8 emergency departments with co-located walk-in centres with the same number of "traditional" emergency departments. This paper focuses on the results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of users.
Results: Survey data demonstrated that patients were frequently unable to distinguish between being treated at a walk-in centre or at an accident and emergency (A&E) department and, even where this was the case, opportunities to exercise choice about their preferred care provider were often limited. Few made an active choice to attend a co-located walk-in centre. Patients attending walk-in centres were just as likely to be satisfied overall with the care they received as their counterparts who were treated in the co-located A&E facility, although walk-in centre users reported greater satisfaction with some specific aspects of their care and consultation.
Conclusions: Whereas one of the key policy goals underpinning the co-location of walk-in centres next to an A&E department was to provide patients with more options for accessing healthcare and greater choice, leading in turn to increased satisfaction, this evaluation was able to provide little evidence to support this. The high percentage of patients expressing a preference for care in an established emergency department compared with that in a new walk-in centre facility raises questions for future policy development. Further consideration should therefore be given to the role that A&E-focused walk-in centres play in the Department of Healths current policy agenda, as far as patient choice is concerned.
Abbreviations: A&E, accident and emergency; NHS, National health service
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Egbunike, J N, Shaw, C, Bale, S, Elwyn, G, Edwards, A
(2008). Understanding patient experience of out-of-hours general practitioner services in South Wales: a qualitative study. Emerg. Med. J.
25: 649-654
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
