ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE Trial
1 Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
J Arnold
Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; j.a.arnold{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Background: Chest pain units (CPUs) provide a system of care for patients with acute chest pain that can improve outcomes while reducing health service costs. The Effectiveness and Safety of Chest Pain Assessment to Prevent Emergency Admissions (ESCAPE) multicentre trial was undertaken to determine whether CPUs could be successfully established throughout the National Health Service (NHS).
Aim: To describe the structure, processes and outcomes of patients managed by CPUs in the ESCAPE Trial.
Method: 7 of 14 participating hospitals were randomly allocated to establish CPU care. Each hospital set up a CPU using standardised protocols to provide biochemical cardiac marker and exercise treadmill testing for low-risk patients. Research staff then followed up patients for 30 days to identify any adverse events, defined as chest pain-related readmission to hospital for more than 48 h, non-fatal myocardial infarction and all deaths.
Results: The 7 units managed a total of 1644 patients during their first year of operation. Activity varied from 1 to 7 patients per 1000 adult emergency department attendances. Overall, 1374 (83%) patients were discharged after CPU assessment, with 23 (1.7%) adverse events recorded among those discharged. Some, but not all, of the variation in activity could be attributed to hospital size and patient selection.
Conclusion: CPU care can be instituted in a safe manner at a variety of NHS hospitals, with most patients being discharged after assessment. However, there is variation in the number and type of patients managed by the different units. Further research is required to identify reasons for variation in CPU activity.
Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CPU, chest pain unit; ESCAPE, Effectiveness and Safety of Chest Pain Assessment to Prevent Emergency Admissions; ETT, exercise treadmill testing; NHS, National Health Service
Relevant Article
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Emerg. Med. J. 2007 24: 453.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Clancy, M.
(2007). Effectiveness of chest pain units. BMJ
335: 623-624
[Full Text] -
Goodacre, S., Cross, E., Lewis, C., Nicholl, J., Capewell, S., ESCAPE Research Team,
(2007). Effectiveness and safety of chest pain assessment to prevent emergency admissions: ESCAPE cluster randomised trial. BMJ
335: 659-659
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
