Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2007;24:477-479; doi:10.1136/emj.2007.046383
© 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales

Michele Twomey1, Lee A Wallis2, Jonathan E Myers3

1 School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
2 Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town & Stellenbosch University, Capetown, South Africa
3 Occupational and Environmental Health Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Capetown, South Africa

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Michele Twomey
School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; satriage{at}webmail.co.za

Objective: To examine whether current validation methods of emergency department triage scales actually assess the instrument’s validity.

Methods: Optimal methods of emergency department triage scale validation are examined in developed countries and their application to developing countries is considered.

Results and conclusion: Numerous limitations are embedded in the process of validating triage scales. Methods of triage scale validation in developed countries may not be appropriate and repeatable in developing countries. Even in developed countries there are problems in conceptualising validation methods. A new consensus building validation approach has been constructed and recommended for a developing country setting. The Delphi method, a consensual validation process, is advanced as a more appropriate alternative for validating triage scales in developing countries.

Abbreviations: ATS, Australasian Triage Scale; CTAS, Canadian Triage Acuity Scale; ED, emergency department; ESI, Emergency Severity Index; ETAT, Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment; MEWS, Modified Early Warning Score


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hodkinson, P W, Wallis, L A (2009). Cross-sectional survey of patients presenting to a South African urban emergency centre. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 635-640 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Patel, M., Maconochie, I. (2008). Triage in children. Trauma 10: 239-245 [Abstract]  
  • Veen, M v., Steyerberg, E. W, Ruige, M., Meurs, A. H J v., Roukema, J., Lei, J. v. d., Moll, H. A (2008). Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study. BMJ 337: a1501-a1501 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bruijns, S R, Wallis, L A, Burch, V C (2008). A prospective evaluation of the Cape triage score in the emergency department of an urban public hospital in South Africa. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 398-402 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

A method to measure validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care
Mirjam van Veen, et al.
EMJ Online, 25 Oct 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs