ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Imaging paediatric blunt abdominal trauma in the emergency department: ultrasound versus computed tomography
1 Emergency Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
2 Radiology Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
Correspondence to:
Miss J G Browning, Emergency Department, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh EH16 5NZ, UK; jenbrowning{at}hotmail.com
Objective: To determine whether an abdominal ultrasound scan performed by paediatric radiologists is effective in the diagnosis of abdominal injuries in children.
Method: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of all children who presented with blunt abdominal trauma to a paediatric teaching hospital (RHSC) over a 5-year period between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2005. Hospital notes and radiology computer systems were interrogated and data were collected and analysed.
Results: Of the 80 children with blunt abdominal trauma, 56 (70%) had abdominal imaging and 23 (30%) had no imaging. Of the 56 imaged, 48 (86%) had an USS of which 25 (52%) were positive (16 demonstrated solid organ injury, 8 free fluid and 1 suspected bladder rupture); 3 of these went on to have a CT scan. 23 had a normal USS; 2 of these children went on to have a CT scan because of a high index of suspicion for small bowel perforation due to their mechanism of injury and clinical signs. Both of these CT scans were normal. Eight children (14%) had a CT scan as the primary investigation, 6 of which (75%) were positive (5 demonstrated liver lacerations and 1 free fluid with no obvious source). All these abnormalities were demonstrated on follow-up USS. 23 children had no abdominal imaging and once their symptoms and signs had settled they were safely discharged home.
Conclusion: Abdominal USS performed by paediatric radiologists is an accurate method of assessing abdominal injuries. However, CT scanning can assess certain abnormalities such as pancreatic or duodenal injuries and small amounts of free intraperitoneal air more accurately. The importance of serial clinical examination must not be overlooked.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Kevin Mackway-Jones
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 623.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
-
Clinical diagnostic tests
-
Radiology (diagnostics)
-
Radiology
-
Trauma
-
Pancreas and biliary tract
- Relevant Article
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
