ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Patterns of ophthalmological complaints presenting to a dedicated ophthalmic Accident & Emergency department: inappropriate use and patients perspective
Accident & Emergency Department, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Mr S Hau, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London UK; scott.hau{at}moorfields.nhs.uk
Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of patients attending an Accident & Emergency (A&E) department of an eye hospital, identify reasons for inappropriate use and propose recommendations in improving the provision of ophthalmic A&E care.
Methods: A prospective questionnaire-based survey of consecutive patients who presented to the A&E department over a 7-day period was conducted. Patient demographic data, reason for attending from the patients perspective, diagnosis, duration of symptom and management outcome were recorded. The diagnoses were grouped into acute and non-acute, and into those which were considered suitable to be seen in a primary care setting by specialist trained community general practitioners (GPs) or optometrists.
Results: 560 completed questionnaires were evaluated; 171 cases (30.6%) were considered as non-acute and 210 (37.5%) were considered suitable to be seen by specialist trained community GPs or optometrists. 352 patients (62.8%) had symptoms for 1–6 days, 144 (25.7%) had symptoms for 1–4 weeks and 64 (11.5%) had symptoms for >1 month before presentation; in the latter two groups, 52 of the 208 patients (25%) were diagnosed with non-acute conditions. "Great concern" was the most common reason for attending the casualty department. 350 patients (62.5%) were discharged on the day of presentation.
Conclusions: A significant number of patients who attend ophthalmic A&E departments have non-urgent conditions that could be managed satisfactorily in a primary care setting by specialist trained GPs or optometrists outside the hospital casualty department. Improvement in education of patients, the provision of specialist ophthalmic training for GPs and optometrists, and expansion of outpatient services are needed so that casualty remains a genuine emergency service.
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Simon Carley
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 709.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Not Cas, not A&E but Emergency Medicine
- John M Ryan
- EMJ Online, 19 Nov 2008 [Full text]
- Re: Not Cas, not A&E but Emergency Medicine
- Simon D Carley
- EMJ Online, 22 May 2009 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
