Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2008;25:745-749; doi:10.1136/emj.2007.054965
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The PAWS score: validation of an early warning scoring system for the initial assessment of children in the emergency department

P Egdell1, L Finlay2, D K Pedley3

1 Emergency Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, UK
2 Department of Paediatrics, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK
3 Emergency Department, Dumfries and Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr P Egdell, Emergency Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear SR4 7TP, UK; paulegdell{at}doctors.org.uk

Objective: To devise a physiology-based scoring system for assessment of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) and to validate the system retrospectively.

Study design: Age-dependent physiological parameters designed to reflect the cardiovascular, respiratory and neurological status of patients presenting to the ED were included in a scoring system called the Paediatric Advanced Warning Score (PAWS). A retrospective pilot evaluation was performed to validate PAWS.

Setting and patients: PAWS scores were calculated retrospectively for 46 consecutive children who required admission from the ED to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and for 49 control children who were admitted from the ED to the general paediatric ward.

Main outcome measures: To validate the PAWS score, we determined if this score was able to identify patients who require admission to the PICU and were therefore significantly unwell.

Results: The PAWS score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86. Using a trigger score of 3 or above, PAWS was able to identify patients requiring PICU admission with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 90%.

Conclusions: This pilot study has shown that a physiology-based scoring system can help to identify children in the ED requiring PICU admission. Future prospective validation of PAWS is necessary to assess its ability to identify all children in need of urgent assessment in the ED.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary survey
Simon Carley
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 709. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Thompson, M, Coad, N, Harnden, A, Mayon-White, R, Perera, R, Mant, D (2009). How well do vital signs identify children with serious infections in paediatric emergency care?. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 888-893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

The PAWS score and the need to consider oxygen requirement
Lynn Sinitsky, et al.
EMJ Online, 24 Nov 2008 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs