Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2008;25:799-802; doi:10.1136/emj.2007.052951
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Recording of vital signs in a district general hospital emergency department

B Armstrong1, H Walthall2, M Clancy, M Mullee3,4, H Simpson1

1 Emergency Department, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
2 School of Health & Social Care, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
3 Emergency Department, Southampton University Hospital Trust, Southampton, UK
4 Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, CCS Division, University of Southampton, UK

Correspondence to:
Mr B Armstrong, Department of Emergency Medicine, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Foundation Hospital, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK; bruce.armstrong{at}bnhft.nhs.uk

Aim: To examine and explore factors that may influence the recording of vital signs in adult patients within the initial 15 min and again within 60 min of arrival in the "resuscitation" and "major" areas of the emergency department (ED).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of recording of vital signs was performed on 400 consecutive sets of notes from adult patients presenting to the "major" or "resuscitation" areas of a district general hospital ED. The effect of staffing levels, triage category and attendances on the recording of vital signs was examined using logistic regression. The main outcome measures were the proportion of patients with all vital signs recorded within 15 min of arrival, the proportion of patients with all vital signs repeated within 60 min of arrival and the outcomes of logistic regression analysis.

Results: Only 223/387 patients (58%) had all vital signs recorded within 15 min of arrival and only 29/387 (7%) had all vital signs repeated at 60 min. There was a significant relationship between the failure to record vital signs and lower triage categories. There was no evidence that staffing levels or number of attendances predicted the recording of vital signs within 15 min of arrival.

Conclusion: Recording of vital signs was poor and unrelated to staffing levels or numbers of patients attending the ED. Failure to record patients’ vital signs undermines strategies to detect and manage ill patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary survey
Geoff Hughes
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 787. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Armstrong, B. P, Clancy, M., Simpson, H. (2008). Making sense of vital signs. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 790-791 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs