EMJ

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Emergency Medicine Journal 2008;25:407-410; doi:10.1136/emj.2007.054742
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dewar, C
Right arrow Articles by Corretge, M
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dewar, C
Right arrow Articles by Corretge, M

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Interrater reliability of the Wells score as part of the assessment of DVT in the emergency department: agreement between consultant and nurse practitioner

C Dewar, M Corretge

Emergency Department, Queen Margaret Hospital, Operational Division NHS Fife, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr C Dewar, Emergency Department, Queen Margaret Hospital, Operational Division NHS Fife, Whitefield Road, Dunfermline, Fife KY12 OSU, UK; colin.dewar{at}faht.scot.nhs.uk

Objectives: To determine interobserver variability between an emergency medicine consultant and nurse practitioners for the use of the Wells score in the assessment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the emergency department.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was undertaken in a population of 100 cases of suspected DVT. The Wells score reading from the consultant was compared with the reading of the nurse practitioners. Consultant and nurses were blinded to each other’s assessments. The nurse practitioners were trained in interpreting the Wells score by assessing 100 patients together with the consultant before the start of the study.

Results: Consultant and nurse practitioner assessments resulted in the same final Wells score in 81% of cases (simple agreement), with a kappa score of 0.74 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.84). If the nurse practitioner score had been followed in preference to the consultant assessment, this would have resulted in eight patients being assessed in a lower risk algorithm (8%).

Conclusion: There is good interobserver agreement between consultant and nurse practitioners for the use of the Wells score as part of a DVT assessment service within the emergency department. Pretest scoring is pivotal to integrated strategies for the exclusion of DVT. The Wells score is a robust and reliable tool for pretest scoring in the emergency department regardless of the grade of the assessor, provided there is adequate training in its use.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine