EMJ

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Emergency Medicine Journal 2008;25:428-430; doi:10.1136/emj.2007.054155
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sood, T
Right arrow Articles by Hinchley, G
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sood, T
Right arrow Articles by Hinchley, G

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department

T Sood, D Sally, N Spencer, A Banerjee, G Hinchley

Emergency Department, Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield, UK

Correspondence to:
Mr A Banerjee, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chase Farm Hospital, The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK; ashis.banerjee{at}bcf.nhs.uk

Objective: To determine the feasibility of screening asymptomatic young men for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a suburban emergency department setting.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Chase Farm Hospital Emergency Department in Enfield, North London.

Participants: Asymptomatic sexually active men aged 16–24 years.

Methods: A convenience sample of men aged 16–24 years attending the emergency department was offered urine-based screening for Chlamydia at triage. Verbal consent was obtained and first pass urine specimens were tested using the strand displacement amplification technique. Participants were traced by their preferred method of contact in order to be offered treatment within 2 weeks of attendance at the emergency department.

Results: 67 men participated, 64 of whom were tested, 3 returning positive tests. The prevalence of Chlamydia in asymptomatic men attending the emergency department was 4.7%.

Conclusion: Urine testing for genital C trachomatis in the emergency department can identify asymptomatic men in the community who may otherwise remain undetected. It is suggested that this is a worthwhile screening test to offer in the emergency department, providing follow-up for treatment can be arranged locally. There is no requirement for increased emergency department input into these patients over and above introducing them to the screening programme.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
© 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine