PREHOSPITAL CARE
AMPDS categories: are they an appropriate method to select cases for extended role ambulance practitioners?
1 Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (South), Rotherham, UK
2 Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Consultant in Emergency Medicine and Pre-Hospital Care, Mid Yorkshire Trust, Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr J T Gray, Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (South), Fairfields, Moorgate Road, Rotherham S60 2BQ, UK; james.gray{at}yas.nhs.uk
Objectives: To examine the correlation between the AMPDS prioritisation category at dispatch and the use of alternative clinical dispatch using data from an emergency care practitioner (ECP) service dispatching on likely clinical need.
Methods: Data for a 12-month period were reviewed for all 999 calls seen by an ECP and comparison was made between AMPDS code/category and outcome of the patient.
Results: 3955 cases were reviewed with all but two AMPDS code groups represented. All categories showed alternative pathways to the emergency department used by ECPs: category A, 36%; category B, 52%; category C, 44%.
Conclusions: Clinically directed dispatch for ECPs allows utilisation of alternative pathways across all AMPDS categories, suggesting that AMPDS alone is not a good predictor of potential for avoiding emergency department attendance and possible hospital admission.
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Malcolm Woollard
Emerg. Med. J. 2008 25: 545.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
