Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2009;26:39-40; doi:10.1136/emj.2008.057737
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Door to relocation time for dislocated hip prosthesis: multicentre comparison of emergency department procedural sedation versus theatre-based general anaesthesia

J Gagg1, L Jones1, G Shingler2, N Bothma3, H Simpkins4, S Gill5, J Benger6, G Lloyd1

1 Emergency Department, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
2 Emergency Department, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK
3 Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
4 Emergency Department, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
5 Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
6 Academic Department of Emergency Care, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr G Lloyd, Emergency Department, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK; gavin.lloyd{at}rdeft.nhs.uk

Background: Dislocation of a hip prosthesis is a painful event which has an incidence of 4% for primary total hip arthroplasty. Relocation is traditionally performed under general anaesthesia in the operating theatre, but relocation using sedation in the emergency department (ED) has been reported, with a limited success rate of 62%. A study was undertaken to compare door to relocation times for ED sedation and theatre general anaesthesia.

Methods: The notes of all patients attending five centres in the south west of England with prosthetic hip dislocation over a 12-month period between 2005 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed using standardised data collection forms.

Results: Successful ED reduction was significantly quicker than failed ED reduction and theatre-based general anaesthesia (2 h 21 min vs 8 h 32 min; p<0.001). No statistical difference was found between failed ED reduction and theatre general anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Reduction of dislocated hip prostheses in the ED saves nearly 6 h compared with theatre-based general anaesthesia and is therefore advocated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Primary survey
Darren Walter
Emerg. Med. J. 2009 26: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mathieu, N, Jones, L, Harris, A, Hudson, A, McLauchlan, C, Riou, P, Lloyd, G (2009). Is propofol a safe and effective sedative for relocating hip prostheses?. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 37-38 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs