REVIEW
On the philosophy of diagnosis: is doing more good than harm better than "primum non nocere"?
Emergency Medicine Research Group, Research Office, Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr R Body, Emergency Medicine Research Group, Research Office, Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; rbody{at}doctors.org.uk
Diagnosis is arguably the cornerstone of medicine. Without at least some form of diagnosis the practice of medicine would not be possible. This narrative review explores common philosophical assumptions and challenges the notion that a certain diagnosis can ever be made. The idealistic concept of "primum non nocere" is discussed, and whether the utilitarian goal of achieving "the greatest happiness for the greatest number" is a feasible or preferable alternative is considered. It is concluded that utilitarianism is inescapably intertwined with modern medical practice. Suggestions are presented to further the understanding of diagnostic medicine by embracing its principles.
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Kevin Mackway-Jones
Emerg. Med. J. 2009 26: 235.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- It’s good, but is it utilitarian? A response to Body and Foëx
- Kirsty Challen
- EMJ Online, 16 Sep 2009 [Full text]
- Primum, non nocere.
- Giles N Cattermole
- EMJ Online, 22 Oct 2009 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
