Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Emergency Medicine Journal 2009;26:245-249; doi:10.1136/emj.2008.058123
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the College of Emergency Medicine.

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Resuscitation tables: a useful tool in calculating pre-burns unit fluid requirements

A J Lindford, P Lim, B Klass, S Mackey, B S Dheansa, P M Gilbert

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr A J Lindford, Department of Plastic Surgery, Töölö Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospitals, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki, P O Box 266, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland; lindford{at}hotmail.com

Background: There is considerable variation in the standard of initial burn management, particularly burn surface area assessment and application of resuscitation formulae. Early aggressive management of major burns improves survival. Internationally, the Parkland formula employing lactated Ringer’s solution is used for fluid resuscitation. This study aimed to assess whether Parkland fluid resuscitation tables could improve the accuracy of initial fluid requirement calculations.

Methods: The burn size had first to be determined for an adult and a child using a preshaded Lund and Browder chart. Fluid requirements then had to be calculated using the conventional Parkland formula. The burn size had to be similarly calculated for two further cases and fluid requirements calculated using resuscitation tables. The study had a sample size of 50, consisting of plastic surgery trainees, anaesthetists and burn nurse specialists.

Results: All the participants found the resuscitation tables to be quicker and easier to use. The burn size was correctly calculated in 72% of cases. Fluid resuscitation requirements were correct in only 55% when using the Parkland formula. The use of resuscitation tables improved the accuracy in calculating fluid requirements to 75%.

Conclusions: The use of Parkland fluid resuscitation tables can improve accuracy and ease of calculation of fluid resuscitation requirements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Untitled
Thomas H McKinnell, et al.
EMJ Online, 16 Sep 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

 

The journal is co-owned by and the official journal of College of Emergency Medicine

Official journal of British Association for Immediate Care: BASICS, Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care, Irish Society for Immediate Care and Swedish Society for Emergency Medicine: SweSEM

Emergency Medicine Jobs

Emergency Medicine Jobs