|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL |
| Advanced trauma life support |
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M Davis
Department of Social and Psychological Science, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, St Helens Road, Ormskirk LA39 4QP, UK; mikedavis8702@aol.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is a good educational case for a UK advanced trauma course. The theoretical basis for the educational component of the ATLS instructor course is rarely made explicit and in my experience, never discussed, either among the educationalists or the clinical faculty. In UK practice there is an implied theoretical perspective within the ATLS course that is not subscribed to. In this article I aim to explore this theoretical basis and contrast it with what actually happens in instructor and provider courses in the UK. In doing so the educational justification for a UK based advanced trauma course will be discussed.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ATLS
Despite nods in the direction of "adult education"1 and "reflective practice",2 much of the thinking behind section III chapter 2 of the ATLS instructor course manual3 is based on the behaviourist/instructional design educational theories of Gagné.4 This, however, is not made explicit other than in
Relevant Article
Emerg. Med. J. 2005 22: 1.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A Kilroy Teaching the trauma teachers: an international review of the Advanced Trauma Life Support Instructor Course Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2007; 24(7): 467 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Driscoll and J Wardrope ATLS: past, present, and future Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 2 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |