© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine
PREHOSPITAL CARE
Debate
Commentary from RCGP
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This is a timely call for the standardisation of the training for and the provision of immediate care. The current situation that such a fundamental service consists of a plethora of providers and skills funded, in the main, through charitable means is scandalous. Standardised training leading to a quality assured service is in the best interests of patient safety.
The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) stance is that there must always be a role for doctors in the provision or immediate and unscheduled care, and that all practitioners involved in such care be appropriately trained to national standards. The authors call for regulation leading to the "timely intervention of a competent specialist" is one the College welcomes.
Mackenzie and Bevan speak of raising the standard of the pre-hospital environment to that of at least A&E by citing the latters predominantly consultant led status. While true, consultant
Relevant Article
- Primary survey
- Colville Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2005 22: 235.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
